We are not running a price list yet. We're learning how teams actually use the Procure-to-Pay suite, and we are taking on a small number of design partners while we do. Pricing will be set once we have evidence — not before.
There is no "starter" tier and no feature gating during beta. The platform is the platform; the suite is the suite. Either you have it or you don't.
Procure-to-Pay suite
All six domains. Budget, Procurement, Vendors, Contracts, Receiving, Payables.
Multi-entity, day one
Every business document carries a LegalEntity. No FX or intercompany at MVP — coming.
Audit-grade trail
Every write audited. Cross-document transaction trails exportable as signed PDF + JSON.
Role-based access
6 system roles + custom roles. Department scoping. Permissions never granted directly.
Vendor portal
Anonymous magic-link RFQ responses, optional self-service account ladder.
Document-uniform substrate
Status lifecycle, audit, attachments, activity timeline on every document. No exceptions.
Design partners we're actively talking to.
NGOs with donor-funded programmes
You need strict per-funder allocation, line-level budget tracking, and an audit trail your auditor can actually use. The strictness model was built for you.
Mid-market commercial finance teams
You've outgrown spreadsheets and tabbed Xero. You want approval chains, three-way match, and reporting that doesn't lie about cached aggregates.
Small businesses that bill from vendor invoices
You don't want a process — you want a tool that doesn't make you invent one. Same engine, every gate relaxed.
Or spin up a tenant first and decide later — the signup flow doesn't ask for a credit card.